I think Zotero's Word integration is a lot nicer.įinally, to the extent that it matters to you, Zotero is open source and run out of a public university, Mendeley is proprietary and owned by Elsevier. You can pay >$50/month for groups in Mendeley depending on their size. As I allude to above, it's collaboration features are much, much more affordable (groups are free regardless of size-you only pay for storage, which a) isn't required and b) is 10/month max. It is more customizable, both natively and via add-ons. In terms of legal sources that includes basic support for LexisNexis and HeinOline, though not WestLaw (and I don't believe there's much hope for that). Zotero does a lot better for import from a broader range of sources.
ZOTERO VS MENDELEY ANDROID
There are two (free) iOS apps by 3rd party developers for Zotero that people are very happy with, but there is no good Android solution.
New Mendeley Reference Manager is now available Get started. Other systems: Mendeley Desktop for Windows Mendeley Desktop for macOS. Mendeley also has a native iOS app and is developing and Android app. Download for Ubuntu and Kubuntu 16.04 LTS, 17.04 and Debian Stretch 9.
ZOTERO VS MENDELEY PDF
The other issue that Mendeley is investing heavily in is tighter PDF integration-things like displaying the ToC and key figures from PDFs, integrating PDF annotations into the references manager (which ZotFile does in a similar way, but Mendeley arguably does more smoothly).
Generally speaking, Mendeley puts more emphasis on social features-by that I don't mean collaboration, which works just as well (and much cheaper/free) in Zotero, but things like presenting yourself via a profile page, getting article recommendations, and finding other users interested in similar issues.
0 kommentar(er)
